As I was browsing the internet I came across two interesting parallel, independent but related articles,
1.Legalize prostitution if you can’t curb it: SC to govt (Published in the Times of India)
2.Marriage versus prostitution (Blogged by Rahul Verma, a men’s rights activist)
Article #1 talks about the Supreme Court observing that,
“When you say it is the world’s oldest profession and when you are not able to curb it by laws, why don’t you legalize it? You can then monitor the trade, rehabilitate and provide medical aid to those involved,” Justices Dalveer Bhandari and AK Patnaik told Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam.
Whilst article #2 talks about the similarities between marriage and prostitution and also carries an analytical comparison of the two and the final outcome is that, the current context, prostitution outperforms marriage for men.
Now, the Supreme Court has been shouting at the top of its lungs about many things, but the Govt. hardly listens be it the case wherein the Supreme Court named the Section 498A as a tool of legal terrorism way back in May, 2005 but still the Govt. is not ready to scrap the section allowing it to be hijacked by fund chasing radical gender obsessed extremists, or the case where the Supreme Court passed a judgment under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution instructing the Govt. to implement police reforms but does the Govt. listen? Absolutely not.
So, it is very clear that even in this case the Govt. is not going to listen and will not legalize prostitution while marriage continues to be burden on Indian men (being worse than prostitution).
So what should Indian men do in such a situation?
Continue marrying and ruin their lives or stop marrying? Choice belies with them.
Yeah, surely, why not even legalize free sex like USA… when we are entirely adopting all the polices, culture and tradition (though not taking the other good qualities)…. We should go ahead in embracing western hell and leave our Old vedic, the so called culture and tradition of India……
Did you ask the same question when anti-male laws were copied from west and marriage was made a crime for Indian men?
And which culture are you talking about? What has your so called Vedic culture given to men ? Only roles and responsibilities, no rights or freedom of choice. Wake up.
Mr. Legalfighter,
Who is responsible??/
The definition of crime in IPC is copied from the Irish Penal Code, which was framed by the Britishers…. CrPC,CPC, land acquisition act… all are the copy paste of the western culture…. Who made Hindu Marriage ACt…. why we say divorce… is the Hindu (Vedic) system says about divorce and 5 kinda of maintenance law…. DV act… that is eccentric to certain persons
You are diverting the focus. Tell me did you ask the same question at that time?
No, so now when I am talking of abolishing marriage why are you so peeved?
After all, what is it that a man gets in a marriage? Nothing but abuse.
Mr Legalfighter,
You need to learn more about our History of India… Surely NOT the history framed by McColy, who tampered everything….. Did you know the ever-most old Takshila University…. was burnt and it tooks months to stop the fire….
Well Mr. Legalfighter,
Hope you did not understand my first comment… what u are saying i m also having the same view… when u say “abolishing marriage”…. i say “free sex”…. so where is the issue??? You say marriage is a suffering, I say embrace the western hell and the Indian husband will have no suffering…. they will earn and enjoy… 57K husband will NOT suicide…..
Indeed Altius,
When all the bad things like biased laws, feminism etc. have been embraced from the west, no-one opened their pie-holes then.
But now the time has come to correct the mistakes and start embracing the good stuff from the west, like freedom for Men, Choice of sex for Men, Choice of not marrying for Men, etc.
GENDER NEUTRAL LAW:
REPLACE MEN OR WOMEN WITH PERSON.
REPLACE HUSBAND AND WIFE WITH SPOUSE.
BUT WHO CARES????????????
recently Korea has amended its a old bullshit gender biased law… and made it to gender neutral.
OK, my apologies for misunderstanding.
Hey Mr.LegalFighter,
Do not mis-understand me…. our problem is that we are Indian Husband… When u are born in a so called shravan family (GEN), that means u are born with a curse…. and when u get married in Indian Infrastructure…. U ARE THE REAL CRIMINAL….
WE MUST FORGET OUR INDIAN VALUES AND CULTURE AND TRADITION…. AND THINGS WILL BE QUITE EASY AND LESS SUFFERING….
DO NOT THINK LIKE INDIAN… LIKE THIS IS MY WIFE.. THINK LIKE SHE IS MY PROSTITUTE/RAK-KHAIL/VEDIC DEV-DASHINI…. EVERY THING WILL GO RIGHT WITH U…. BECAUSE THIS IS KAL-YUG… SAHI RASTEE PE CHALOGE TOH GAAND MEIN PAREGI…
[...] (more…)<http://stopindianmarriages.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/stop-marriages-legalize-prostitution/#more-15> [...]
I think most people miss the point of these newer socially antagonistic laws that disrupt independent familial development. The entire judiciary and this applies to all subjugated nations of which India has within the past decade or so subscribed to a unified and global social engineered policy. The effort is simply to create a new political paradigm and inter gender policy with a known outcome. It does not matter whether males view females as inferior or sex objects, the offensive is to curtail the females ability for independent sexual reproduction. Under the guise of feminism as a proxy we are dealing with the mass conversion of females from being a homemaker class to a newer labor force. While sex was formerly an act with mainly a natural pairing of two humans. It has with all legal authority become a product of commerce. The object of destroying the institution of marriage has been more or less achieved in the west. With a more resilient male culture in Asia it will not be without many cultural upheavals and the shedding of blood. The policies main objective is just to render all males as legally incapable of defending themselves, worse turning all females into profit centers with both the state and judicial blessing. In return the privileges for females are total immunity from stupidity, evil acts and better yet the removal of all rights to all individuals. Whether females may as well become prostitutes is a matter of opinion, the most dangerous of which is to prostitute their very souls for immediate material benefits at the expense of their communities or future. In the west the demographics for females is very poor beyond the age of 35 +. Despite many peoples perceptions material wealth does not the person make, but it helps only in this life.
As per Marrage law in india, marrage itself is a crime for Indian Men and you will be treated as Free ATM machine, rest of the life, irrespective you are good or bad.
So, decide yourself , do you wnat to do the crime or not?
@ Jonathan, u look like u from UK. havent you heard the famous quote in UK, to become crimial, buy a car. same in india. to become a criminal ,, marry
[...] any means trying to reduce the gap between “Housewives and Prostitutes” given the fact that the Supreme Court of India recommended legalizing prostitution and the Govt. of India clubbed the “Housewives, prostitutes and beggars” into the same category [...]
[...] any means trying to reduce the gap between “Housewives and Prostitutes” given the fact that the Supreme Court of India recommended legalizing prostitution and the Govt. of India clubbed the “Housewives, prostitutes and beggars” into the same category [...]
[...] [...]